ReviewTranslational psychiatry2026
The role of lipids in neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders: A narrative review.
Review in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lipids are highly abundant in the brain and play key roles in membrane regulation, neurotransmission, neurogenesis, and inflammation. The same processes are involved in neuromodulation mechanisms. While neuromodulation therapies have shown promising outcomes for treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders, the factors determining individual variability in treatment response remain poorly understood. Furthermore, the potential impact of neurometabolic factors in predicting response has been largely overlooked. This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of lipids in psychiatric neuromodulation. Particularly glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have been described as important mediators. Current evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship between lipids and neuromodulation therapies such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Neuromodulation effects are associated with lipid metabolism changes, including phospholipids, sphingolipids, and fatty acids. ECT is associated with an increase in lipid peroxidation and alterations of cholesterol and fatty acid levels, while rTMS is associated with normalization of sphingolipids and phospholipids levels. Solely one study investigated the relation between deep brain stimulation and lipids, showing an association with sphingolipid metabolism. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review to consolidate findings on the relationship between lipids and neuromodulation. By mapping this emerging field, these findings might be a first step towards investigating whether lipids could be a potential biomarker for response prediction in the future. As most findings are preliminary, with variability across studies, further investigation is warranted and current findings should be interpreted in the context of their limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.