Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41654540›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Image processing pipeline for AI-driven nanoparticle megalibrary characterization.

Alexandra L Day, Carolin B Wahl, Roberto Dos Reis, Youjia Li, Wei-Keng Liao, Vinayak P Dravid, Chad A Mirkin, Alok Choudhary, Ankit Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandra L DayDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Carolin B WahlDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Roberto Dos ReisDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Youjia LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Wei-Keng LiaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Vinayak P DravidDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Chad A MirkinDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Alok ChoudharyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Ankit AgrawalDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. ankit-agrawal@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-22-1-0300Army Research Office W911NF-18-1-0200National Science Foundation DMR-2308691National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-2234667NIST DOC 70NANB24H136U.S. Army Research Office W911NF-23-1-0285U.S. Department of Energy DE-SC0023450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent innovations have made it possible to produce megalibraries, millions of structurally and compositionally distinct nanoparticles on a chip. These megalibraries yield vast volumes of data that are impossible to analyze manually, necessitating the development of automated tools. In previous work, we created a binary classification machine learning model to select quality nanoparticle images for downstream analysis. In this work, we show that adding a custom image processing step before training can produce significantly higher-performing models in a fraction of the time and make them more robust to different image noise levels and microscope acquisition settings. The image processing pipeline proposed here effectively cleans raw nanoparticle images, enhances key features, and allows us to use much lower resolution images and simpler neural network model architectures. These features result in higher performance and significant cost savings. Experiments demonstrate superior performance relative to baseline, including an 18.2% improvement in recall and a 13.1% increase in accuracy. Given the high cost of downstream analysis, it is critical to minimize false positives, and our best-performing model reaches a precision of 95.9% and a weighted F-score of 95.1% on an unseen test set. Additionally, model training time is reduced from hours to less than a minute. We also show that, using this custom image processing pipeline, model performance is significantly improved at lower pixel resolutions compared to downsizing alone. We expect that adopting this pipeline for AI-driven automated nanoparticle characterization will allow researchers to rapidly and accurately analyze much greater volumes of data, thereby accelerating materials discovery.

Identifiers

PMID41654540
PMCPMC12946250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.