Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41654529›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Single-pulse TMS functional mapping of sensorimotor cortex during decision-making task.

Anna Udoratina, Nikita Grigorev, Andrey Savosenkov, Denis Ermolaev, Usama Muhammad, Anton Kiselev, Vladimir Maksimenko, Susanna Gordleeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Udoratina *Center for Cognition and Decision making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation.
Nikita Grigorev *Center for Cognition and Decision making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation.
Andrey SavosenkovNeuromorphic computing center, Neimark University, Nizhny Novgorod, 603081, Russian Federation.
Denis ErmolaevNeurodynamics and Cognitive Technology Laboratory, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, 603022, Russian Federation.
Usama MuhammadFaculty of Computer science and Engineering, Innopolis University, Innopolis, 420500, Russian Federation.
Anton KiselevCoordinating Center for Fundamental Research, National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation.
Vladimir MaksimenkoCenter for Cognition and Decision making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation.
Susanna GordleevaCenter for Cognition and Decision making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation. gordleeva@neuro.nnov.ru.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FSWR-2025-0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual decision-making involves distinct sub-processes, including sensory encoding, decision formation, and motor execution. Studying the specific contributions of cortical areas to these components could deepen our understanding of decision-making mechanisms and inform therapeutic approaches for cognitive impairment. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (spTMS) enables the functional investigation of cortical involvement during task performance, revealing the participation of specific regions in cognitive processes. When combined with the drift diffusion model (DDM), spTMS can precisely characterize effects on different decision sub-processes. In this study, 30 healthy participants performed a perceptual decision-making task requiring right-hand finger responses to complex visual stimuli. We delivered spTMS to sensorimotor cortex regions at two time points during task performance (200 ms and 800 ms post-stimulus onset). Results demonstrated region-specific modulation patterns: stimulation of the premotor dorsal caudal cortex (PMdc) selectively reduced reaction time (RT) by decreasing non-decision time (NDT), indicating its role in motor preparation. In contrast, primary motor cortex (M1) and primary somatosensory cortex (S1) stimulation produced opposing effects - decreased NDT coupled with increased evidence accumulation time (EAT) - resulting in no net RT change. These findings highlight how spTMS combined with DDM can dissect distinct cortical contributions to decision-making sub-processes.

Indexed as

Brain MappingDecision MakingSensorimotor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSomatosensory CortexYoung Adultdrift diffusion modelfunctional mappingPerceptual decision-makingreaction timesensorimotor cortextranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41654529
PMCPMC12949047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.