ReviewThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2026
Systemic Treatments for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Anti-IgE and Beyond.
Review in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted Therapy for Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Critical Narrative Review and an Evidence-Graded Approach to Agent Selection.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Treatment of mast cell-mediated angioedema].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- From acute mast cell activation to a structured immunothrombotic and autoimmune niche in chronic spontaneous urticaria.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Novel Benzothiadiazine Derivatives as MRGX2 Antagonists for Treating Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Integrating Technology into Urticaria Management: Telemedicine, Remote Monitoring and Patient-Centered Care.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Treatment Approaches for Omalizumab-Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic urticaria, which is divided into chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), affects a significant percentage of the global population and carries a high burden of unmet medical need. Current standard of care includes nonsedating H1-antihistamines and omalizumab, which targets peripheral blood IgE and downregulates mast cell and basophil IgE receptors. However, omalizumab provides complete hive resolution in approximately 45% of patients and does not produce lasting remission. This review examines the clinical data for newly approved and emerging systemic therapies spanning IgE-based and non-IgE-based targeting strategies. The therapeutic landscape has expanded rapidly, and multiple mechanisms are under investigation. IgE-targeted approaches include omalizumab biosimilars, with CT-P39 having received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Dupilumab received FDA approval for H1-antihistamine-refractory CSU, supporting targeting type 2 cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13. Most recently, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), remibrutinib, demonstrated significant reductions in Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days in phase 3 trials, leading to FDA approval. Newer c-Kit (cKit or KIT) inhibitors have also shown efficacy in CSU and CIndU, with barzolvolimab showing sustained efficacy post-treatment. Finally, other BTKi, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2/JAK inhibitors, MRGPRX2 antagonists, and other novel mechanisms are advancing through clinical trials. Some drugs have been halted in development because of safety concerns, such as fenebrutinib (BTKi), THB001 (Larvol; c-Kit inhibitor), and EP262 (MRGPRX2 antagonist), whereas others, targeting the alarmin thymic stromal lymphopoietin (tezepelumab), the Th2 cytokine IL-5 (mepolizumab) and its receptor IL-5R (benralizumab), as well as lirentelimab (sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 8 [Siglec-8]) and AK006 (Siglec-6), were halted because of lack of efficacy. However, these failed trials have provided informed insights into the relevant pathways for CSU pathogenesis and treatment. In summary, systemic therapies for CSU are maturing with multiple phase 3 programs targeting the IgE pathway and Th2 cytokines leading to recent approvals. This review will provide an overview of these recently completed and ongoing clinical studies investigating emerging IgE and non-IgE therapeutic options for CSU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.