ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Gaining the Upper Hand? Further Evidence of Pain as a Pleasurable Experience and the Unexpected Relationship Between Sadomasochistic Sexual Preference and Chronic Pain.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gaining the Upper Hand? Further Evidence of Pain as a Pleasurable Experience and the Unexpected Relationship Between Sadomasochistic Sexual Preference and Chronic Pain.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA growing body of research reports positive consequences of acute pain, including emotional self-regulation. Pain as a pleasurable experience has also been regarded in the context of sadomasochistic (SM) interest, albeit quantitative empirical evidence is scarce. Recently, an elevated prevalence of chronic pain (CP) has been reported in SM practitioners; however, in absence of a control group. To contribute to research in the field, we strove to see whether we could replicate the finding and further aimed to identify psychological predictors of SM.
methodA total of 617 participants (N = 242 with SM sexual preference) completed an online questionnaire battery comprising psychometric instruments for the measurement of pain attitudes, sensation seeking and pain sensitivity. An age- and sex-matched sample was created to control for their respective influence.
resultsCP prevalence in the SM subsample was 47.2%, which we found to be significantly increased compared to the prevalence in the non-SM subsample (29.4%). Neither sex nor age seemed to explain the relationship. There were no interaction effects of SM × CP on pain attitudes. A hierarchical logistic regression model explained around 42% of the variance in SM, with CP, sensation seeking, and viewing pain as a challenge as significant predictors.
conclusionsWe replicated an increased CP prevalence in SM and ruled out previous sampling biases. We further extended evidence on factors predicting SM sexual preference. Large-scale, representative and prospective studies are needed to corroborate the idea of SM as a coping strategy used by some CP patients. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We demonstrated a significantly elevated chronic pain prevalence of around 47% in individuals with sadomasochistic sexual preference, ruling out previously discussed sampling biases. Possibly, sadomasochistic practise is used as a coping strategy by some chronic pain patients. We further presented a model of pain-related and psychological variables explaining around 42% of variance in sadomasochistic sexual preference in general. The results are discussed in terms of their potential to inform pain management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.