Trial reportClinical drug investigation2026
A Single-Center, Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Formulation, Two-Sequence, Two-Period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Two Eltrombopag Olamine Tablets (25 mg) in Healthy Chinese Subjects in the Fed State.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06768619 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Two-formulation, Two-sequence, Two-period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Eltrombopag Olamine Tablets), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Two-formulation, Two-sequence, Two-period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Eltrombopag Olamine Tablets (25 mg) in Healthy Chinese Subjects in the Fed State
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveEltrombopag is an orally active thrombopoietin receptor agonist indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopenia. The purpose of this randomized study is to evaluate the bioequivalence of test and reference eltrombopag olamine tablets in healthy Chinese subjects after consuming a low-calcium, high-fat, high-calorie breakfast.
methodsThis was a single-center, randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Enrolled subjects were randomly divided into two groups at a 1:1 ratio, with each group randomly receiving either the test or reference eltrombopag olamine tablets per period. The washout period was set to 14 days. The concentration of eltrombopag in plasma was quantified using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the entire trial.
resultsThis study ultimately included 36 healthy subjects. The geometric mean ratio for maximum plasma concentration between the test or reference eltrombopag olamine tablets was 92.68%; the geometric mean ratio for the area under the concentration-time curve from the time zero to the last measurable concentration was 97.15%; for the area under the concentration-time curve from the time zero to infinity, the geometric mean ratio was 97.30%. The geometric mean ratios and their 90% confidence intervals for the key pharmacokinetic parameters fell within the range of 80.00-125.00%. Within the safety data set of 36 subjects, adverse events were reported in nine subjects, totaling 14 occurrences. All reported adverse events were Grade 1, and no serious adverse events occurred.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that a single oral administration of the test eltrombopag is bioequivalent to the reference eltrombopag in healthy subjects after consuming a low-calcium, high-fat, high-calorie breakfast, with both formulations exhibiting a favorable safety profile. These results support the therapeutic interchangeability of the test formulation with the reference product, offering a reliable alternative for clinical use. CLINICAL
trial registrationThis trial was registered at the Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Disclosure Platform ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn , CTR20230598) and ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT06768619).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41653397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.