ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026
Chronic Pain and Distress in the Primary Care Setting: Implementing a Digital Pain and Distress Screener to Optimize Integrated Psychological Treatment.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and acceptability of a guided internet-based acceptance and commitment therapy intervention (MobACT) for adults with chronic pain in Italy: A pilot mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Psychological Pain Care in Medical Settings: A Special Issue Highlighting Recent Advances in Intervention and Delivery.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain is common, complex, undertreated, and linked with lower quality of life. The primary care setting provides an opportunity to standardize screening for chronic pain and distress and facilitate early intervention via integrated psychological treatment. This study describes the use of a digital pain and distress screener to improve identification of those who could benefit from integrated psychological treatment to manage chronic pain in primary care. An electronic pain and distress screening tool was implemented in an academic internal medicine clinic at an urban hospital. Data regarding screening completion, percentage of positive screens, and number of integrated psychology referrals were pulled from the electronic medical record. 1,676 unique pain and distress screenings were completed between March 2024 and January 2025. Forty-three percent of patients screened positive (n = 837). Thirty-nine patients were referred for integrated psychological treatment and 20 completed at least one visit. Older adult patients completed the digital pain and distress screener at similar rates to other digital screenings with positive screening rates similar to the known prevalence of comorbid pain and distress. Referral rates were low though a high proportion of referrals began treatment. With modifications to workflow, the pain and distress screening could facilitate early and effective intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41653376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.