Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41653376›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026

Chronic Pain and Distress in the Primary Care Setting: Implementing a Digital Pain and Distress Screener to Optimize Integrated Psychological Treatment.

Erin T Tobin, Minerva So, Chloe Sutlick, Jan Mooney, David Willens, Jordan M Braciszewski, Lisa R Miller-Matero

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erin T TobinHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA. etobin1@hfhs.org.
Minerva SoMichigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Chloe SutlickWayne State University, Detroit, USA.
Jan MooneyEmory University, Atlanta, USA.
David WillensHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA.
Jordan M BraciszewskiHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA.
Lisa R Miller-MateroHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain is common, complex, undertreated, and linked with lower quality of life. The primary care setting provides an opportunity to standardize screening for chronic pain and distress and facilitate early intervention via integrated psychological treatment. This study describes the use of a digital pain and distress screener to improve identification of those who could benefit from integrated psychological treatment to manage chronic pain in primary care. An electronic pain and distress screening tool was implemented in an academic internal medicine clinic at an urban hospital. Data regarding screening completion, percentage of positive screens, and number of integrated psychology referrals were pulled from the electronic medical record. 1,676 unique pain and distress screenings were completed between March 2024 and January 2025. Forty-three percent of patients screened positive (n = 837). Thirty-nine patients were referred for integrated psychological treatment and 20 completed at least one visit. Older adult patients completed the digital pain and distress screener at similar rates to other digital screenings with positive screening rates similar to the known prevalence of comorbid pain and distress. Referral rates were low though a high proportion of referrals began treatment. With modifications to workflow, the pain and distress screening could facilitate early and effective intervention.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMass ScreeningPrimary Health CarePsychological DistressPsychotherapyStress, PsychologicalAdultAgedDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementReferral and ConsultationChronic PainDigital ScreeningPrimary Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.