ReviewAdvances in therapy2026
Measuring What Matters to Patients with Pompe Disease: A Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments for Capturing Treatment Benefits of Innovative Novel Therapies.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to identify potential concepts of interest (COIs) and clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for late-onset and infantile-onset Pompe disease (LOPD and IOPD) and to assess whether the current COAs are reliable and valid to capture patients' experiences.
methodsTwo literature reviews were conducted to identify, describe, and document key signs, symptoms, and impacts relevant to patients and to identify COAs used in Pompe disease. The COAs identified were mapped against the potential COIs to determine which instruments provided the best concept coverage from a patient perspective. Shortlisted COAs were further examined to assess their content validity and psychometric properties.
resultsSixteen articles for LOPD and 9 for IOPD were identified for concept extraction. Patients with Pompe disease experience a range of signs, symptoms, and impacts. Most COAs currently used in Pompe disease are generic; only 3 LOPD COAs and 1 IOPD COA were disease-specific. Following mapping, 14 instruments for LOPD and 4 for IOPD were identified as providing the greatest coverage, with notable evidence gaps supporting content validity and/or psychometric properties of all shortlisted COAs.
conclusionSeveral COIs were identified from the literature that may be of importance to patients with Pompe disease. Individual COAs frequently used in assessing these concepts were found to have gaps with regards to content validity and psychometric properties. Additional research with patients with Pompe disease could be considered to address issues of content validity. Furthermore, the use of several COAs could be considered in future studies to capture what matters most to patients with Pompe disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.