ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Elucidating the causal relationships between cerebrospinal fluid metabolites and glioblastoma insights from mendelian randomization study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) metabolites could potentially direct reflecting the biochemical processes involved in central nervous system metabolism. This study aims to delineate the potential causal relationships between CSF metabolites and Glioblastoma (GBM) using Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis.
methodsThis research employs a two-sample MR framework, utilizing genetic instrumental variables derived from GWAS datasets corresponding to CSF and plasma metabolites, and GBM. Data from separate samples for the exposure and outcome were analyzed using specialized R packages designed for two-sample MR and Bayesian weighted MR analyses.
resultsSignificant causal relationships were identified between GBM and several CSF metabolites through two-sample MR analysis mainly using the IVW method. Notably, associations were observed with 3-methoxytyramine sulfate (OR 1.039, 95% CI 1.010 to 1.070, p-value 0.009), caffeine (OR 1.132, 95% CI 1.021 to 1.255, p-value 0.018), dimethyl sulfone (OR 1.087, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.178, p-value 0.043), fructose (OR 0.985, 95% CI 0.969 to 0.998, p-value 0.049), and phenol sulfate (OR 1.074, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.131, p-value 0.007). An inverse causal relationship was also observed between CSF fructose levels (as exposure) and GBM (OR 0.255, 95% CI 0.089 to 0.725, p-value = 0.010), suggesting protective effects. These findings were substantiated through Bayesian MR analysis.
conclusionThe study highlights significant links between specific CSF metabolites and GBM, suggesting that these metabolites may influence tumor biology and could serve as potential biomarkers for GBM diagnosis and progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41653332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.