Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41653328›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026

Sex and menopause-based differences in presentation of early Lyme disease: A prospective cohort study.

Alison W Rebman, Ting Yang, John N Aucott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alison W RebmanLyme Disease Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2360 W Joppa Rd. Suite 320, Lutherville-Timonium, Baltimore, MD, 21093, USA. arebman1@jhmi.edu.
Ting YangLyme Disease Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2360 W Joppa Rd. Suite 320, Lutherville-Timonium, Baltimore, MD, 21093, USA.
John N AucottLyme Disease Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2360 W Joppa Rd. Suite 320, Lutherville-Timonium, Baltimore, MD, 21093, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although prior research has established sex and menopausal status-based differences in immune response, susceptibility, and severity to a variety of pathogens, their relevance in early Lyme disease is understudied. We examined the clinical and serologic presentation of patients with early Lyme disease, stratified first by sex then by menopausal status. We also explored the hypothesis that males would present with more severe early Lyme disease. In this prospective cohort study from the Mid-Atlantic US, 243 adult, antibiotic-naïve patients were enrolled with a diagnostic erythema migrans rash present. Demographic, physical exam, symptom, laboratory, and two-tier serology data were collected at a baseline, and a post-treatment visit 3 weeks later. Lyme disease severity was operationalized through six indicators: rash size, number of acute symptoms, dermatologic dissemination, positive serology, liver function elevation, and elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. Unadjusted group comparisons and multivariate regression adjusting for potential confounders were used to assess difference. In logistic models adjusted for age, Lyme disease duration, systemic steroid use, and co-morbid thyroid disease, males had higher odds of testing two-tier positive (OR = 1.77 [1.03, 3.04], p = 0.039). This difference was more pronounced between males and pre-menopausal females (OR = 2.93 [1.26-6.79], p = 0.012) and no significant difference was found comparing males to post-menopausal females. In ordinal logistic models with Lyme disease severity as the outcome adjusted for age and Lyme disease duration, males had higher odds of being in a higher disease severity score category (OR = 1.94 [1.20,3.15], p = 0.028); again, particularly in comparison to pre-menopausal females (OR = 2.26 [1.13,4.58], p = 0.044). Heart palpitations (p = 0.023), vomiting (p = 0.007), and photophobia (p = 0.057) trended towards higher reporting among females, while sleep difficulty (p = 0.010) was higher among males. No differences were found on non-dermatologic components of the physical exam. We found sex and menopausal status to be relevant in accounting for variability in two-tier serologic status and severity of early Lyme disease in a well-characterized group of patients. Lower rates of seroreactivity among females is unexpected but may be consistent with lower acute severity of disease. Our clinical findings underscore the need for additional research to understand possible contributing biologic and/or social behavioral factors, as well as their impact on timely diagnosis and post-treatment conditions.

Indexed as

Lyme DiseaseMenopauseAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsDiagnosisLyme diseaseSerologic testsSexSymptom reporting

Identifiers

PMID41653328
PMCPMC12886233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.