Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41653299›Full record

ReviewBiodegradation2026

Removal of nitrogen and emerging pollutants from anaerobically treated effluents from domestic wastewater, using nitritation/anammox: a state of art review.

Abid Ali Khan, Beni Lew, Ido Halperin, Rubia Zahid Gaur, Fares Halahlih, Vasileios Diamantis, Alexandros Eftaxias, Kapil Kumar, Carlos Dosoretz, Isam Sabbah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abid Ali Khan *Department of Civil Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi, India.
Beni Lew *Department of Civil Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Ido HalperinDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Rubia Zahid GaurInstitute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research, Organization, Newe Yaar Research Center, Ramat Yishai, Israel. rubsgaur@gmail.com.
Fares HalahlihThe Institute of Applied Research, the Galilee Society, Shefa Amr, Israel.
Vasileios DiamantisDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100, Xanthi, Greece.
Alexandros EftaxiasDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100, Xanthi, Greece.
Kapil KumarDepartment of Civil Engineering, NIT Delhi, Delhi, India.
Carlos DosoretzDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Technion - IIT, Haifa, Israel.
Isam SabbahThe Institute of Applied Research, the Galilee Society, Shefa Amr, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of anaerobic ammonium oxidation bacteria, commonly known as AnAOB in the early 1990s, more than a quarter century has passed and partial nitrification/anammox process for sewage treatment is still mainly in lab and pilot-scale research phase with few plants in operation. The main challenges for that are enrichment, grow and how to keep AnAOB in the reactor on low-strength wastewater treatment, such as in anaerobically treated domestic sewage. Another important aspect is need for continuous supply of nitrite and how to minimize nitrite consumption by others than anammox. In addition to that other minor control parameters play an important role, such as hydraulic and sludge retention time, dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, etc. This paper presents a detailed review of essential process parameters and identifies gaps and solutions for effective implementation of the anammox process highlighting the different factors that suppress AnAOB growth, along with the aspects favouring activity and immobilization. Reactor start-up and operation, bacteria inhibition and conversion of emerging-pollutants is also investigated, with their effect on AnAOB and their removal. The main conclusions are the sustainability evaluation, which found that the process reduce the overall GHG emissions compared to conventional nitrogen removal processes; a possible microbial pathway that could be involved for simultaneous organics, nutrients and emerging-pollutants removal; and, finally, a novel concept of a three-stage treatment process in two up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket-based system is proposed.

Indexed as

NitrogenWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnaerobiosisBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBioreactorsNitrificationOxidation-ReductionSewageNitrogenSewageWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnaerobic digestionBiological nutrient removalEmerging pollutants removalPartial nitrification/anammox process

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.