Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41653296›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026

Digital spatial profiling reveals additive effects of triple therapy on tumor microenvironment: anti-PD-L1, anti-VEGF, and PARP inhibition in mouse models.

Akihiko Ueda, Ryusuke Murakami, Kentaro Ishida, Kohei Hamada, Jumpei Ogura, Shunsuke Kawahara, Yuka Mise, Yuko Hosoe, Masamichi Sugimoto, Daiko Wakita and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Akihiko UedaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Ryusuke MurakamiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. ryusukem@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kentaro IshidaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Kohei HamadaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Jumpei OguraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Shunsuke KawaharaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yuka MiseDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yuko HosoeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Masamichi SugimotoProduct Research Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Yokohama, Japan.
Daiko WakitaProduct Research Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Yokohama, Japan.
Taito MiyamotoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Rin MizunoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Mana TakiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Koji YamanoiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Ken YamaguchiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Junzo HamanishiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Masaki MandaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors show limited efficacy against immune-desert tumors, including ovarian cancer. We investigated triple therapy combining anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, and Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) on tumor microenvironment using spatial profiling.

methodsTwo mouse models were employed: MC38 (immune-inflamed phenotype) and HM-1 (immune-desert phenotype). MC38 mice received anti-PD-L1 and anti-VEGF as monotherapy or dual combination. HM-1 mice received anti-PD-L1, anti-VEGF, and PARPi as monotherapy, dual combinations (anti-PD-L1 + anti-VEGF, anti-PD-L1 + PARPi, anti-VEGF + PARPi), or triple combination (anti-PD-L1 + anti-VEGF + PARPi). Spatial distribution of immune cells and the tumor microenvironment was analyzed using immunohistochemistry (CD8) and dual immunofluorescence (CD8/Granzyme B) with distance-based density quantification from tumor margins (0 to - 150, - 150 to - 300, - 300 to - 450 μm). High endothelial venule (HEV) formation was evaluated via CD31/MECA79 dual immunofluorescence.

resultsMC38 tumors responded to all treatments by day 10. Conversely, HM-1 tumors showed no response at day 10 but responded to two combination therapies by day 20: anti-PD-L1 + anti-VEGF (1.5-fold reduction, p = 0.04) and triple combination therapy (1.7-fold reduction, p = 0.03). In MC38, at - 150 to - 300 μm, anti-PD-L1 + anti-VEGF enhanced CD8 + Granzyme B + cells 1.9-fold versus Control (p = 0.01). In HM-1, at 0 to - 150 μm, triple therapy enhanced CD8 + Granzyme B + cells 2.8-fold (p = 0.02), while anti-PD-L1 + anti-VEGF increased CD8 + Granzyme B + cells 2.5-fold (p = 0.03). Both triple and anti-PD-L1 + anti-VEGF therapies induced CD31 + MECA79 + HEV formation (p < 0.01).

conclusionsTriple therapy may overcome immune-desert ovarian cancer through additive HEV formation, enhancing cytotoxic CD8 + T cell infiltration into the tumor.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsOvarian NeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsTumor MicroenvironmentVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnimalsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMiceB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AImmune checkpoint inhibitorOvarian cancerPARP inhibitorSpatial profilingTumor microenvironmentVEGF inhibition

Identifiers

PMID41653296
PMCPMC12882906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.