Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41653291›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2026

Clinical predictors of overall survival in pediatric patients with intramedullary spinal tumors: an analysis of the SEER database.

Arjit Singh, Saarang Patel, Jacob Gould, Noah Yaffe, Guan Li, Lou Blanpain, Julian Gendreau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arjit SinghDepartment of Neuroscience, Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Saarang PatelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, USA.
Jacob GouldDepartment of Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Noah YaffeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Guan LiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Lou BlanpainDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Julian GendreauDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. gendreauj@ohsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntramedullary tumors account for 35-40% of all intraspacial tumors in pediatric patients. The gold standard of care remains aggressive surgical resection as these tumors are slow progressing in nature. Despite the significant body of literature on this pathology, little has been assessed regarding survival, outcomes, and surgical resection for pediatric patients with intramedullary tumors.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 493 pediatric patients with intramedullary spinal tumors from the SEER database was performed. Patients were classified into three surgical groups: No Resection, Subtotal Resection (STR), and Gross Total Resection (GTR). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were utilized. Subgroup analyses were conducted for astrocytomas and ependymomas.

resultsOf 493 patients, 52 (10.5%) received no resection, 314 (63.7%) underwent STR, and 127 (25.8%) underwent GTR. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy use was highest in the STR group (p =  < 0.001; p = 0.004, respectively). In the full cohort, neither STR nor GTR conferred a significant survival benefit. Chemotherapy (HR: 5.438; p < 0.001) and radiotherapy (HR: 3.538; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. In the astrocytoma subgroup, extent of resection was not associated with survival benefit, and both chemotherapy (HR: 4.250; p =  < 0.001) and radiotherapy (HR: 3.493; p =  < 0.001) were associated with increased hazard. Conversely, in ependymoma patients, GTR significantly improved survival (HR: 0.050; p = 0.015), while radiotherapy did not (HR: 4.896; p = 0.011).

conclusionGTR was found to be beneficial for ependymoma patients. In the full cohort analysis, STR nor GTR were of significant survival benefit. Further prospective studies are warranted to better understand the landscape for this specific patient population.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaEpendymomaSpinal Cord NeoplasmsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeurosurgical ProceduresPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramTreatment OutcomeAstrocytomaChemotherapyDisparitiesEpendymomaGross total resectionRadiotherapySubtotal resection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.