SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Endovascular reperfusion strategies for pregnancy-related pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) during pregnancy or post-partum is challenging especially in women at intermediate or high-risk of adverse outcomes. Catheter-directed therapies (CDTs) are increasingly used given their potential efficacy and relatively low complication rates. We systematically reviewed the evidence on CDTs use in pregnancy and post-partum PE. Literature search was conducted in bibliographic databases, reference lists, and review articles until 2 July 2025, without restrictions. Main efficacy and safety outcomes were maternal all-cause and PE-related mortality, fetal mortality, improved right ventricle dysfunction (RVD) and/or pulmonary artery (PA) pressures, improved lung perfusion/clot burden reduction, and maternal major bleeding (MB). We identified 65 case reports, 4 case series and 1 cohort study for a total of 76 patients. Maternal all-cause mortality within 7 days from CDT was 2.8% (2/72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-9.7%) with no PE-related deaths. In-hospital fetal mortality was 12.5% (5/40; 95% CI, 4.2-26.8%). Within 72 h from CDT were observed: an improvement of RVD and/or PA pressures in 96.2% (25/26; 95% CI, 80.4-99.9%), and in lung perfusion/reduction in clot burden in 94.4% of cases (34/36; 95% CI, 81.3-99.3%); maternal MB in 17.2% of cases (11/64; 95% CI, 8.9-28.7%), with 10 out of 11 events (90.9%) reported in the post-partum period. Current evidence is limited and of low quality. CDTs should be considered only after a multidisciplinary evaluation of selected cases, balancing potential benefits and bleeding risks, the latter being mainly observed in the post-partum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41653269What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.