ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
Systematic parameter mapping for Wavelet-Based scatter correction in SPECT: clinical perception versus quantitative metrics.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhoton scatter significantly degrades Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) image quality, with scattered photons accounting for 30-40% of detected counts within standard energy windows. While conventional scatter correction methods face limitations including noise amplification and computational demands, wavelet transforms offer promising capabilities for sinogram-domain correction. However, comprehensive parameter optimization remains unexplored.
methodsWe evaluated 96 mother wavelets across seven families, implementing three decomposition levels and five thresholding strategies in a Monte Carlo simulation framework. Scatter-contaminated sinograms were processed using discrete wavelet transforms and reconstructed via filtered backprojection. Quantitative assessment employed Universal Image Quality Index (UIQI) with varying block sizes (3 × 3, 25 × 25, 128 × 128) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Three nuclear medicine physicians performed blinded qualitative assessment of the processed images.
resultsAmong 94 viable wavelets (excluding outliers db45 and rbio3.1), global optimization identified Rigrsure and Heursure thresholding at decomposition level 1 as optimal for maximizing UIQI (0.559 ± 0.002), while per-slice optimization favored Minimaxi thresholding at level 2. Strong positive correlation existed between UIQI (25 × 25) and UIQI (128 × 128) (r = 0.887, p < 0.01), with both metrics inversely related to RMSE error (r≈ - 0.73, p < 0.01). Despite UIQI optimization, RMSE-optimized images received significantly higher visual quality rankings from physicians (69% improvement, p < 0.001), revealing critical divergence between quantitative metrics and diagnostic utility.
conclusionThis study establishes wavelet-based scatter correction as a viable approach for SPECT image enhancement through systematic parameter mapping. The marked preference for RMSE-optimized images over UIQI-optimized ones underscores the necessity of aligning algorithmic optimization with clinical perception rather than technical metrics alone. These findings provide a foundation for standardizing wavelet implementation in SPECT scatter correction, directly connecting mathematical optimization to diagnostic relevance in nuclear medicine imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.