ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
Role of the oxygen supply position in the circuit during continuous positive airway pressure therapy: a randomized cross-over simulation study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeContinuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is the main treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Hypoxemic patients with sleep-disordered breathing may require CPAP and additional low-flow oxygen. However, specific recommendations on where to attach the oxygen bleed-in connector are lacking.
methodsThis randomised cross-over trial assessed the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO₂) in a simulated OSA patient’s lung resulting from different rates of low-flow oxygen (1, 2 and 3 l/min) added via three different bleed-in connector locations under different levels of either fixed pressure (5, 9 and 12 cmH2O) or constant flow (5, 10 and 15 l/min) (repeated 3x in random order). The three locations tested in a single-limb circuit with a vented full-face mask were: (1) near the CPAP mask between the mask and tubing, (2) at the tube outlet of the device, and (3) directly connected to the oxygen-port of the device.
resultsThe bleed-in connector positioned near the tube outlet generally produced the highest and near the CPAP mask the lowest FiO₂. At the highest pressure and flow, FiO₂ remained more stable across the locations and oxygen flows of 1–3 l/min, compared to lower pressure and lower flow. FiO₂ differences between locations were notably more pronounced under different flows, ranging from 0 to 22% relative change, compared to a more limited range of 0 to 8.3% under varying CPAP pressures.
conclusionWe recommend positioning the oxygen bleed-in connector at the device tube outlet for CPAP devices without an oxygen port, particularly when using lower pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41653265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.