ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Customized positioning of the glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a new computer aided design methodology.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Zone-specific acromial cortical thickening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) is widely used to treat shoulder joint pathologies. However, this procedure may result in reduced range of motion (ROM), scapular notching, and prosthetic instability. These complications vary among patients, highlighting the need for individualized preoperative planning. This study introduces a novel parametric methodology to determine optimal glenoid component positioning by evaluating ROM, instability ratio, and the percentage of bone resected.
methodThe proposed approach was applied to four patient models treated with two prosthetic designs. The methodology consists of four steps within a patient-specific parametric tool: 3D anatomical reconstruction, virtual surgical planning, biomechanical and geometric evaluation, and identification of optimal configurations. Fifteen glenoid component orientations were generated by varying tilt angles. The best configurations were identified based on ROM and instability assessments, while bone resection volume was calculated as an additional parameter.
resultsMaximum values of abduction-adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation were 87.23°, 90°, and 70.59°, respectively, although not achieved in a single configuration. Instability ratios ranged from 0.23 to 0.62. Bone resection varied between 0.4% and 5.5%, depending on the configuration.
conclusionsThis methodology provides a patient-specific framework to support preoperative planning in RSA. By combining ROM analysis, instability assessment, and bone preservation, the approach enables the identification of glenoid component orientations that improve mobility while minimizing instability risk and surgical invasiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.