ArticleOecologia2026
Frugivores flock, but do carnivores follow? Multi-trophic responses to masting in a tropical rainforest.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulses of plant resources can influence the spatial aggregation and population dynamics of primary consumers, but the extent to which these effects cascade up the food chain to affect secondary consumers remains poorly understood. Mast fruiting events in Southeast Asian dipterocarp forests, for example, are known to impact a wide range of bird and mammal granivores, but it remains unclear whether the predators of these vertebrates are indirectly affected by seed production. Here, we assess bottom-up effects of masting on a suite of primary and secondary consumers in a tropical rainforest in Borneo, using structural equation models to characterize a network of frugivore/granivores and carnivores. The models were parameterized using 10 years of camera trap and seed availability data collected between 2013 and 2024, spanning two major masting events. These models also account for an outbreak of introduced disease (African swine fever) and the reduced abundance of human visitors in the forest during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dipterocarp seed availability was correlated with the intensity of local site use by omnivorous Malay civets (Viverra tangalunga) and bearded pigs (Sus barbatus), but not granivorous murid rodents or pheasants. Leopard cat site use was correlated with murid rodents, but not pheasants. These findings suggest that masting in this ecosystem is associated with site use intensity of some large-bodied primary consumers but not smaller granivores, and therefore did not percolate up the food web to influence the predators of these taxa, in contrast to research from temperate masting systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41653214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.