Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41653134›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2026

Microstructural Insights into Solid Dispersions: A Combined Small-Angle Neutron Scattering and Molecular Dynamics Approach.

Haoshi Gao, Yunsen Zhang, Hanqiu Jiang, Chunyong He, Yubin Ke, Haifeng Li, Defang Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haoshi GaoSchool of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yunsen ZhangState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China.
Hanqiu JiangInstitute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China.
Chunyong HeInstitute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6045-3648
Yubin KeInstitute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China.
Haifeng LiInstitute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China.
Defang OuyangState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8052-4773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid dispersion is a widely adopted formulation strategy to enhance the solubility of water-insoluble drugs. However, the molecular-level structural determinants of stability and dissolution behavior remain poorly understood. This study integrates Small-Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) technology with coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CGMD) simulations to investigate the effects of preparation methods (melting vs solvent evaporation) and drug loadings (10%, 15%, 25%) on the microstructure and crystallinity of PXM-PEG solid dispersions. Deuterated PEG (d-PEG) is used in the SANS to enhance the scattering intensity in samples. The findings revealed that the lamellar thickness decreased significantly from 173.01 Å (pure d-PEG) to 44.12 Å (25% drug loading, melting method), while the

Indexed as

Chemistry, PharmaceuticalCrystallizationDrug CompoundingMolecular Dynamics SimulationNeutron DiffractionPolyethylene GlycolsScattering, Small AngleSolubilitySolventsX-Ray DiffractionPolyethylene GlycolsSolventscoarse-grained molecular dynamics simulationsPEGpiroxicamsmall-angle neutron scatteringsolid dispersion

Identifiers

PMID41653134
PMCPMC13058892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.