ArticleInfancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies2026
Screen Time Is More than Just the Screen: Indirect Media Exposure Dominates Infants' Digital Environments.
Article in Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations Between Early Screen Exposure and Neurocognitive Outcomes in Children Aged 2-5 Years: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Screen Time Is More than Just the Screen: Indirect Media Exposure Dominates Infants' Digital Environments.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2026Article
- Screen exposure patterns and their associations with obesity and sleep among preschool children in a resource-limited city in eastern China: a multicenter cross-sectional study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital media has become ubiquitous for families, yet little is known about how infants and toddlers are exposed to it across different contexts and demographics. Most existing research focuses narrowly on total screen time, often neglecting critical factors such as media type, user, timing, and background exposure. The current study sought to address this gap by asking 252 socioeconomically diverse caregivers of children 8-25 months about their child's media exposure, including how much, what kinds, when, by whom, and in what form digital media is used in the home. Consistent with prior work, infants averaged over 2 hours/day of direct media use but were exposed to even higher rates of indirect background TV (over 4.6 hours/day). Such background exposure represents 66%-75% of children's total TV and handheld device exposure and is significantly more common on weekends. However, there is substantial variability in children's media environments, with older infants being exposed to greater amounts and more diverse forms of media. Notably, children from lower-SES households experience more background media and caregiver phone use, which may introduce both visual and auditory distractions during key developmental periods. This study highlights that the most prominent source of media exposure early in life is not through children's personal use of devices, but rather indirect exposure through background media use, which varies widely across families. To truly capture the landscape of young children's technology exposure and the impact on development, we must consider the broader media environment, not just the screen in front of the child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.