Value of Clinical Evidence and Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) Studies.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for establishing the efficacy and safety of new treatments. However, clinical evidence derived from the systematic analysis of real-world data generated through routine clinical practice can complement RCT data by offering insights into treatment performance in broader, more heterogeneous patient populations and clinical care settings. The integration of high-quality clinical evidence into health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) is increasingly important, as it supports healthcare decision-making across multiple stakeholders, including regulatory agencies, payers, clinicians, and patients. Multiple study designs, such as pragmatic trials, hybrid RCTs, external control arms, and observational studies, can provide valuable clinical evidence beyond the controlled trial setting. These data can enhance understanding of comparative effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes, treatment safety, and healthcare utilization and costs. The field of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis offers a compelling example of how clinical evidence derived from global registries and clinical studies has advanced understanding of disease epidemiology, treatment patterns, and the effectiveness of therapies, including riluzole and edaravone. Consequently, this review and the associated supplementary articles are meant to serve as a primer to inform clinicians of the potential contribution of clinical evidence to HEOR studies.