ReviewMuscle & nerve2026
Current and Ongoing Clinical Studies.
Review in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current and Ongoing Clinical Studies.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive overview of current and ongoing studies evaluating intravenous (IV) edaravone and edaravone oral suspension in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In addition to data from clinical practice and post hoc analyses, multiple observational and interventional studies are underway to better understand the efficacy, safety, and biological impact of edaravone in clinical settings. Key studies include SUNRISE Japan, a long-term postmarketing surveillance study of IV edaravone in Japanese patients with ALS; the ALS/Motor Neuron Disease Natural History Study, a longitudinal registry designed to inform clinical trial design and track ALS progression; and the REFINE-ALS study, which is actively collecting biomarker data to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms influenced by edaravone. For edaravone oral suspension, United States Food and Drug Administration approval was supported by Study MT-1186-A01, a phase 3 trial assessing safety and tolerability over 48 weeks, with extension Study MT-1186-A03. Study MT-1186-A02, conducted as an FDA postmarketing commitment, and its extension, Study MT-1186-A04, evaluated whether investigational once daily dosing showed superior efficacy vs. the approved on/off dosing regimen. Collectively, these studies contribute to a growing body of evidence supporting the use of edaravone as a therapeutic option for ALS. They also underscore the importance of continued data collection from both clinical trials and clinical settings to inform optimal treatment strategies and combination therapy approaches as more agents become available in an evolving ALS treatment landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.