ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Introduction to the Supplement.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to the Supplement.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and fatal neuromuscular disease with marked phenotypic and clinical heterogeneity. Three active pharmaceutical agents are currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ALS: riluzole, edaravone (including intravenous [IV] and oral suspension formulations), and tofersen. Study MCI186-19 (Study 19) was a pivotal, phase 3 randomized controlled trial that demonstrated a significant reduction in physical functional decline vs. placebo in Japanese patients with ALS and contributed to FDA approval of IV edaravone in 2017. Edaravone oral suspension was FDA-approved in May 2022 following the results of Study MT-1186-A01, which showed it was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with IV edaravone. Following Study 19, the clinical benefit of edaravone has remained an active area of investigation. This supplement presents data from clinical trials, post hoc analyses, and clinical studies that expand understanding of the use of edaravone in broader ALS populations. Topics include safety in clinical practice, generalizability of efficacy, clinical treatment outcomes, and health economics and outcomes research studies. Together, these findings aim to inform clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders regarding the evolving evidence base for edaravone in the management of ALS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.