ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Survival of Intravenous Edaravone-Treated Patients With ALS: Evidence From Administrative Claims Analyses.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drosophila: An Emerging New Approach Method (NAM) for Studying Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).Cells · 2026Review
- Survival of Intravenous Edaravone-Treated Patients With ALS: Evidence From Administrative Claims Analyses.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Oxidative Stress: A Key Mechanism Driving Neuroinflammation.Neuroimmunomodulation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials remain the cornerstone of evidence generation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), yet their inherent challenges, including disease rarity, heterogeneity, and limited validated biomarkers, highlight the need for complementary clinical evidence. This exploratory, retrospective study assessed overall survival in patients with ALS treated with intravenous (IV) edaravone using data from a large United States administrative claims database of patients enrolled from August 2017 to March 2020. Patients receiving IV edaravone (n = 318) were propensity score matched 1:1 with controls not treated with IV edaravone (n = 318), adjusting for 11 covariates. Median overall survival was 29.5 versus 23.5 months for the edaravone-treated group compared to controls, with a 27% reduced risk of death observed in the treated cohort (p = 0.005). These findings, together with existing data from the pivotal phase 3 Study MCI186-19 of IV edaravone, contribute to the growing body of literature suggesting a dual benefit of edaravone on both function and survival in ALS, offering critical insights for clinicians, patients, and payers navigating ALS treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.