Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41653003›Full record

Trial reportMuscle & nerve2026

Study 19 (MCI186-19) Post Hoc Analyses.

Benjamin Rix Brooks, Jeremy Shefner, Stephen Apple

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin Rix BrooksClinical Trials Planning LLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1914-5061
Jeremy ShefnerBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Stephen AppleTanabe Pharma America, Inc., Jersey City, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-3953

Funding

Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of therapies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), post hoc analyses can provide critical insights into clinical effectiveness, treatment durability, and subpopulation responses. Several post hoc analyses of Study MCI186-19 (Study 19), the pivotal phase 3 RCT that supported the United States Food and Drug Administration approval of intravenous edaravone, have been performed to explore the broader clinical impact of this therapy. These analyses assessed the long-term treatment efficacy, changes in individual ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised item scores, survival and additional milestone events, and the impact of edaravone in patient subgroups defined by disease progression trajectories using latent class analysis. Collectively, these findings reinforce the long-term clinical benefit of edaravone and demonstrate that edaravone may offer benefits across a spectrum of ALS disease trajectories, beyond those defined in the original study criteria. These studies help address questions not captured in the original RCT and may inform future trial design and treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisEdaravoneFree Radical ScavengersDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeEdaravoneFree Radical ScavengersALSamyotrophic lateral sclerosisclinicaledaravoneefficacypost hocStudy 19

Identifiers

PMID41653003
PMCPMC12882033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.