Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652977›Full record

ReviewActa ophthalmologica2026

Infection control in the brain and the eye.

John V Forrester, Paul G McMenamin, Samantha J Dando

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John V ForresterSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-5945
Paul G McMenaminMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Samantha J DandoCentre for Immunology and Infection Control, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Saving Sight in Grampian/Development Trust of University of Aberdeen RG16220-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Central Nervous System (CNS), comprising the brain and the eye, is considered to have a 'privileged' mechanism for dealing with immunological challenge (immune privilege, IP). CNS IP has been revealed through experiments using foreign protein antigens and cell and tissue alloantigens (grafts), but evidence for a role for IP in modulating host-pathogen interactions in the CNS is limited. However, the low frequency of CNS infection in the face of widespread systemic exposure to CNS-tropic infectious agents, together with the high incidence of CNS infection in immunocompromised individuals, suggests that in healthy individuals, the CNS has tightly controlled regulatory mechanisms to protect against infectious agents. Although the naïve healthy brain and retina parenchyma largely lack adaptive immune cells, their border tissues (meninges, uveal tract) contain a full complement of resident immune cells, including CNS-specific regulatory T cells (Tregs), which have a fundamental role in controlling infection in the brain parenchyma. Tregs also underpin ocular IP, particularly of the neural retina. Recent studies report that Tregs are transcriptionally 'customised' to the CNS and function at a distance; that is, are located in niches/hubs around the venous sinuses of the border tissues. T cells resident in the uveal tract probably play a similar role. We propose that Tregs are key drivers of CNS IP and do so by promoting latency of infectious agents.

Indexed as

BrainEye InfectionsImmune PrivilegeAnimalsHumansT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryCNSimmune privilegeinfectionlatency

Identifiers

PMID41652977
PMCPMC13353580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.