ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026
Nutritional and Microbial Responses of Pocillopora verrucosa to Co-Culture With Chromis viridis Damselfish.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nutritional and Microbial Responses of Pocillopora verrucosa to Co-Culture With Chromis viridis Damselfish.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Associations with fish can benefit corals by increasing growth and stress tolerance. To investigate microbial and nutritional responses of corals to fish associations in the context of enhancing coral aquaculture outcomes, Pocillopora verrucosa were cultured for 3 months with different combinations of live feeds and schools of juvenile Chromis viridis damselfish. The combined live feeds and fish treatment resulted in a bacterial community most similar to wild P. verrucosa, dominated by Endozoicomonas-affiliated taxa. Protein content was enhanced in corals with access to live feeds and/or dissolved fish wastes compared to unfed controls. Total lipid concentrations were elevated in captive corals with access to dissolved fish wastes and at moderate levels in those supplied live feeds, likely due to the activity of corals' symbionts and deposition of derived lipids from live feeds, respectively. However, all captive corals demonstrated a significant reduction in storage lipid concentration compared to samples from the wild. Fatty acid analysis indicated these shifts were likely the result of higher light levels in the field supporting Symbiodiniaceae photosynthesis and potentially feeding on wild zooplankton. Co-culturing captive corals with fish and providing appropriate live feeds may therefore offer an effective approach to improve coral nutrition, health and microbiome stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.