Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652869›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026

Nutritional and Microbial Responses of Pocillopora verrucosa to Co-Culture With Chromis viridis Damselfish.

Rachel C Neil, Jonathan A Barton, Andrew Heyward, David S Francis, Leo Nankervis, Thomas S Mock, Craig Humphrey, David G Bourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel C NeilCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Douglas, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-033X
Jonathan A BartonThe National Sea Simulator, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Cape Cleveland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7860-0335
Andrew HeywardAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-3665
David S FrancisNutrition and Seafood Laboratory (NuSea.Lab), School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4829-6926
Leo NankervisCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Douglas, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6845-690X
Thomas S MockNutrition and Seafood Laboratory (NuSea.Lab), School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-3488
Craig HumphreyThe National Sea Simulator, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Cape Cleveland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-036X
David G BourneCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Douglas, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1492-8710

Funding

Great Barrier Reef Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associations with fish can benefit corals by increasing growth and stress tolerance. To investigate microbial and nutritional responses of corals to fish associations in the context of enhancing coral aquaculture outcomes, Pocillopora verrucosa were cultured for 3 months with different combinations of live feeds and schools of juvenile Chromis viridis damselfish. The combined live feeds and fish treatment resulted in a bacterial community most similar to wild P. verrucosa, dominated by Endozoicomonas-affiliated taxa. Protein content was enhanced in corals with access to live feeds and/or dissolved fish wastes compared to unfed controls. Total lipid concentrations were elevated in captive corals with access to dissolved fish wastes and at moderate levels in those supplied live feeds, likely due to the activity of corals' symbionts and deposition of derived lipids from live feeds, respectively. However, all captive corals demonstrated a significant reduction in storage lipid concentration compared to samples from the wild. Fatty acid analysis indicated these shifts were likely the result of higher light levels in the field supporting Symbiodiniaceae photosynthesis and potentially feeding on wild zooplankton. Co-culturing captive corals with fish and providing appropriate live feeds may therefore offer an effective approach to improve coral nutrition, health and microbiome stability.

Indexed as

AnthozoaPerciformesAnimal FeedAnimalsAquacultureBacteriaCoculture TechniquesFatty AcidsMicrobiotaSymbiosisFatty Acids

Identifiers

PMID41652869
PMCPMC12881704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.