Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652847›Full record

ArticlePest management science2026

Relationship between food quality and body size of common vole in different habitats.

Eva Jánová, Ladislav Čepelka, Josef Suchomel, Marta Heroldová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva JánováDepartment of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-1562
Ladislav ČepelkaDepartment of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Josef SuchomelDepartment of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and Apiculture, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marta HeroldováDepartment of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

NAZV QH72075NAZV QL25020011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a close relationship between habitat, food and demographic parameters of common vole populations. The current study investigates the relationship between the quality of food consumed by adult voles in different habitats and vole body size. Populations of common voles were monitored within a small region under the same weather conditions in both forest and agricultural habitats. The quality of the food consumed was determined using near-infrared spectroscopy. The indicator of food quality was the content of nitrogenous compounds. Other key variables were also considered: sex, reproduction, year and date of capture, and relative vole abundance in each plot.

resultsFood quality and body size were dependent on date and habitat. Voles from arable habitats, such as cereals, rape and alfalfa, were larger than those from less managed habitats (set-aside, clearings and forests). Differences in body size did not appear to be directly related to food quality; voles in cereals had lower food quality than voles in clearings, rape, alfalfa and set-aside. Individuals captured in 2008 were smaller than in other years, but the year of capture did not affect food quality.

conclusionDiet quality is a limiting factor for body growth, but body size is influenced by factors other than food nitrogen content alone. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

ArvicolinaeBody SizeEcosystemFood QualityAnimalsFemaleMalebody sizehabitatMicrotus arvalisnitrogen content

Identifiers

PMID41652847
PMCPMC13158441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.