ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2026
Long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy evaluated using patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic malignancies.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) poses a significant challenge for gynecological cancer survivors. However, information on its long-term outcomes remains limited. Recently, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), by which patients assess cancer treatment-related side effects, have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of CIPN associated with paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) therapy using PRO.
methodsPatients with ovarian, corpus uteri, cervical, and other gynecological cancers who underwent surgery were included in the study, regardless of receiving postoperative chemotherapy. Patients with recurrent cancer were excluded. CIPN was assessed via PROs using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG Ntx) subscale. The physicians assessed CIPN using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE).
resultsOf the 616 patients, 304 who received TC therapy (TC group) and 312 who were followed up without chemotherapy (NC group) were evaluated. Using the FACT/GOG Ntx subscale, the weighted mean of total score in the TC group was 8.2 in the first year, which significantly decreased over time (p<0.001). However, 5 years after initiating treatment, the scores in the TC group remained significantly higher than did those in the NC group (p=0.040). Similar trends were found using the NCI-CTCAE evaluations.
conclusionFollowing TC therapy, CIPN might improve over time. However, it might not resolve completely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.