Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652793›Full record

ArticleCrop health2023

Temporal transcriptomics provides insights into host‒pathogen interactions: a case study of Didymella pinodella and disease-resistant and disease-susceptible pea varieties.

Chao Liu, Xingmin Han, Jacob L Steenwyk, Xing-Xing Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crop health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Response of Chinese cabbage (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chao LiuKey Laboratory of Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects of Zhejiang Province, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology and Centre for Evolutionary & Organismal Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Xingmin HanKey Laboratory of Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects of Zhejiang Province, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology and Centre for Evolutionary & Organismal Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Jacob L SteenwykHowards Hughes Medical Institute and the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Xing-Xing ShenKey Laboratory of Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects of Zhejiang Province, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology and Centre for Evolutionary & Organismal Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. xingxingshen@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5765-1419

Funding

The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2021FZZX001-31The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 226-2023-00021The Key Research Project of Zhejiang Lab 2021PE0AC04The National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFD1401600The National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071665The National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Zhejiang Province LR23C140001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascochyta blight is a fungal disease affecting peas, causing significant damage to the plant and reducing crop yield. Host‒pathogen interactions can inform disease prevention and control strategies but remain poorly understood. Here, we generate a near-chromosome-level assembly for Didymella pinodella HNA18, a pathogenic fungus that causes pea ascochyta blight. Comparative genomic analysis of D. pinodella HNA18 and seven publicly available Didymella genomes revealed that the genome of D. pinodella HNA18 encodes the most conserved biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) and a similar number of carbohydrate-activating enzyme (CAZyme) genes compared to other Didymella species. Furthermore, by sequencing and analyzing the transcriptomic data of D. pinodella HNA18 and disease-susceptible and disease-resistant pea varieties during the infection process, we found that the pathogenic fungus mobilized a similar set of infection genes to attack the disease-susceptible and disease-resistant pea varieties, but the timing and intensity of these infection genes were different. For pea varieties in response to the pathogenic fungus, disease-susceptible and disease-resistant pea varieties mobilized similar types of defense genes, while the disease-resistant pea used a higher number of defense genes relative to the disease-susceptible pea during the entire infection process. This study not only provides multiomic resources for the study of the pathogenic fungus D. pinodella HNA18 against its disease-susceptible and disease-resistant pea varieties but also deciphers the mode of interaction between pathogenic fungal infection and plant defense.

Indexed as

Comparative genomicsComparative transcriptomicsDefenseDidymella pinodellaGenome sequencingInfectionInteractionsPathogenicityPea

Identifiers

PMID41652793
PMCPMC12825973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.