Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652641›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2026

Identifying unmeasured heterogeneity in microbiome data via quantile thresholding (QuanT).

Jiuyao Lu, Glen A Satten, Katie A Meyer, Lenore J Launer, Wodan Ling, Ni Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiuyao LuDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 265 South 37th Street, Philadelphia, 19104 PA, USA.
Glen A SattenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, 101 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, 30322, USA.
Katie A MeyerNutrition Research Institute and Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, 500 Laureate Way, Kannapolis, 28081, USA.
Lenore J LaunerLaboratory of Epidemiology and Population Science, NIA, NIH, 7201 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, 20814, USA.
Wodan LingDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 402 East 67th Street, New York, 10065, USA.
Ni ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, 21205, USA. nzhao10@jhu.edu.

Funding

CORONARY ARTERY RISK DEVELOPMENT IN YOUNG ADULTS (CARDIA) STUDY - COORDINATING CENTER (CC)75N92023D00002 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LI, JING · 2023 to 2025
$6.8M
Statistical methods for analyzing messy microbiome data: detection of hidden artifacts and robust modeling approachesR01GM147162 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ni Zhao · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
Statistical Methods for Large Scale Microbiome Studies of Cardiovascular Disease RiskR01HL155417 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
Robust Statistical Methods for Longitudinal Microbiome StudiesR01GM155734 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Wodan Ling · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147162NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM155734NIH HHS 75N92023D00002NIH HHS R01GM147162NIH HHS R01HL155417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiome data, like other high-throughput data, suffer from technical heterogeneity stemming from differential experimental designs and processing. In addition to measured artifacts such as batch effects, there is heterogeneity due to unknown or unmeasured factors, which lead to spurious conclusions if unaccounted for. With the advent of large-scale multi-center microbiome studies and the increasing availability of public datasets, this issue becomes more pronounced. Current approaches for addressing unmeasured heterogeneity in high-throughput data were developed for microarray and/or RNA sequencing data. They cannot accommodate the unique characteristics of microbiome data such as sparsity and over-dispersion.

resultsHere, we introduce quantile thresholding (QuanT), a novel non-parametric approach for identifying unmeasured heterogeneity tailored to microbiome data. QuanT applies quantile regression across multiple quantile levels to threshold the microbiome abundance data and uncovers latent heterogeneity using thresholded binary residual matrices. We validated QuanT using both synthetic and real microbiome datasets, demonstrating its superiority in capturing and mitigating heterogeneity and improving the accuracy of downstream analyses, such as prediction analysis, differential abundance tests, and community-level diversity evaluations.

conclusionsWe present QuanT, a novel tool for comprehensive identification of unmeasured heterogeneity in microbiome data. QuanT's distinct non-parametric method markedly enhances downstream analyses, serving as a valuable tool for data integration and comprehensive analysis in microbiome research. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansBatch effectsConditional quantile regressionMicrobiome dataUnmeasured heterogeneityZero inflation

Identifiers

PMID41652641
PMCPMC12977802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.