ArticleBiomarker research2026
Precision oncology in a dish: patient-derived glioma organoids to guide novel therapeutic strategies.
Article in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Organoids as next-generation models for investigating intracranial tumours.Molecular brain · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults and encompass a spectrum from IDH-mutant gliomas to highly aggressive IDH-wild type glioblastomas (GBM). Despite advances in our understanding of glioma biology, GBM remains largely incurable, with a median overall survival (mOS) of approximately 15 months and minimal improvements over recent decades. The current standard of care, maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, has proven insufficient, and experimental approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T cell therapies have also failed to provide meaningful survival benefits. These limitations highlight the urgent need for innovative, patient-specific platforms to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies.
methodsIn this study, we established patient-derived glioma organoids (GOs) from 61 patients, including both IDH-mutant gliomas (GOmut) and IDH-wild type glioblastoma (GOwt). These organoids were characterized by a variety of techniques against their parental tumors. Afterwards, we performed in silico drug discovery with paired RNA-seq data and validated the results with diverse glioma models.
resultsGOs recapitulated the cellular heterogeneity, histological architecture, and molecular signatures of their parental tumors, including the preservation of clinically relevant features such as immune profiles, vascular structures, and tumor subtype. Notably, GOmuts retained the IDH mutation over extended culture periods. Importantly, GOs maintained resistance to standard chemotherapeutic agents, mirroring the limited response of gliomas to conventional chemotherapy. Our unbiased in silico screening via the DiSCoVER platform applied to RNA-seq data from paired tumors and GOs identified alectinib, dabrafenib, and ruxolitinib as promising candidates. All three compounds proved effective in in vitro cytotoxicity assays, with alectinib and ruxolitinib displaying significant antitumoral effects in vitro.
conclusionsOur findings establish GOs as a clinically relevant and biologically faithful platform for therapeutic screening in glioma. By integrating transcriptomics-based drug discovery with a patient-specific organoid model, we present an easy to implement platform for more effective and personalized treatments for glioma patients. Our findings also support the inclusion of two compounds, alectinib and ruxolitinib, in future clinical investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.