Observational studyBMC public health2026
How deficient are we? A retrospective analysis of vitamin D status in 85,892 Turkish adults.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vitamin D Status and Routine Laboratory Data-Derived 25(OH)D Distributional Benchmarks in Adults from Şanlıurfa, Türkiye: Age, Sex, and Seasonal Variation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesVitamin D deficiency remains a major global public health concern. This study aimed to assess vitamin D levels measured in individuals aged 18 years and older between 2016 and 2025 in a tertiary care hospital and to examine the association of these levels with seasonal, annual, and demographic variables. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective observational study included patients who presented to Duzce University Hospital for any reason between 2016 and 2025 and had serum 25(OH)D levels measured. In total, data from 85,892 individuals were analyzed. Vitamin D status was categorized as sufficient (> 30 ng/mL), insufficient (20-30 ng/mL), or deficient (< 20 ng/mL).
resultsAmong the participants, 70.2% (n = 60,309) were women and 29.8% (n = 25,583) were men. The mean age was 47.16 ± 17.62 years. The overall mean serum 25(OH)D level was 17.90 ± 12.08 ng/mL. Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL) was identified in 68.6% of women and 61.3% of men. Overall, 66.4% (n = 57,051) of participants had Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL), 21.7% (n = 18,635) had Vitamin D insufficiency (20-30 ng/mL), and 11.9% (n = 10,206) had sufficient Vitamin D levels (> 30 ng/mL). The mean 25(OH)D level was 19.16 ± 10.74 ng/mL in men and 17.37 ± 12.56 ng/mL in women, with significantly higher levels observed in men (p < 0.001). Participants aged 65 years and older had significantly higher vitamin D levels compared with those under 65 years (p < 0.001). Seasonally, the highest mean vitamin D levels were recorded in summer, whereas the lowest levels were found in winter.
conclusionVitamin D deficiency continues to pose a substantial public health challenge in Turkey. Addressing this issue should be considered a priority, and further comprehensive studies are urgently needed to support the development of effective strategies aimed at reducing deficiency rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.