ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Technical validation and implementation of a multiplex real-time PCR for differential diagnostic detection of Zika virus, yellow fever virus, dengue virus and chikungunya virus (ZYDC-PCR).
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05139524 (Maintenance and Transmission of Rift Valley Fever Virus and Other Emerging Infectious Diseases in East and Central Africa), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Maintenance and Transmission of Rift Valley Fever Virus and Other Emerging Infectious Diseases in East and Central Africa
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArthropod-borne (arbo)-viruses, especially dengue (DENV), Zika (ZIKV), chikungunya (CHIKV) and yellow fever virus (YFV) are a public health threat worldwide. Timely and reliable diagnostics are key for early case detection, proper patient management and targeted public health interventions. We developed, validated and implemented a real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (ZYDC-PCR) for the simultaneous identification of these four arboviruses.
methodsThe ZYDC-PCR was validated following MIQE guidelines, using Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) and retrospective clinical samples at laboratories in Belgium (n = 44) and Cuba (n = 97). These samples consisted of samples positive for ZIKV (n = 9), CHIKV (n = 11), DENV1 (n = 8), DENV2 (n = 5), DENV3 (n = 26) and DENV4 (n = 47), as well as 14 negative endemic controls from DRC, Oropouche virus (OROV) positive (n = 9) and samples negative for DENV and OROV (n = 10). The ZYDC-PCR was implemented for an exploratory study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), with 725 samples tested in total, in DRC (n = 621), in Antwerp (n = 104) and in both laboratories (n = 99). Extractions and PCRs were done with commercially available kits.
resultsThe results for the technical validation were satisfactory. Detection limits were 11,760 copies (cp)/mL for ZIKV, 1510 cp/mL for CHIKV, 2330 cp/mL for DENV1, and 6800 cp/mL for YFV. For 15 samples (4 ZIKV, 1 CHIKV, 3 DENV1, 1 DENV2, 6 DENV3) with Cq values > 36.5 in the simplex-PCR, the multiplex ZYDC-PCR tested negative. Specificity for cross reactivity samples and retrospective samples tested in Belgium and Cuba was 100%. The sensitivity for the DENV positive samples in Cuba was 91.5%. All samples from DRC tested negative for the four arboviruses.
conclusionThis study’s strength lies in its successful implementation across diverse settings-three geographic (Belgium, DRC, Cuba) locations, multiple PCR machines and kits, and varying lab expertise levels. Despite a slight reduction of sensitivity with low viremia, the ZYDC-PCRs ability to detect multiple arboviruses simultaneously makes it a valuable tool for global molecular surveillance and clinical diagnostics. CLINICAL TRIAL: AUFI in Goma, DRC: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05139524, registered on December 1st, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.