ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026
The delicate dance of debriefing: exploring how behavioural marker systems influence the socio-emotional dynamics of simulation practice.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDebriefing is central to simulation-based education and has been described as both a form of feedback and a broader relational process. While behavioural marker systems (BMS) to assess behavioural (non-technical) skills have been developed to enhance feedback transparency, little is known about how their use shapes the emotional and social dynamics of debriefing. Drawing on feedback literacy and educational alliance frameworks, this study explored how behavioural marker systems influence the emotional and social aspects of debriefing within healthcare simulation.
methodsThis constructivist study involved trainee pharmacists and facilitators participating in a national simulation program in Scotland. Participants used the Pharmacists’ Behavioural Skills BMS, then reflected within online semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using template analysis. Initial coding was informed by feedback literacy and educational alliance frameworks and refined iteratively through team discussion. The metaphor of dance was used to capture nuance and provide relatable examples of the relational and affective dimensions of practice.
resultsTen trainee pharmacists and six facilitators participated. Five interrelated themes were identified: emotional vulnerability (the first tentative steps); clarity of expectations (trusting the choreography); identity work (the dancer in the mirror); peer critique (dancing in sync); agency and ownership (leading the dance). The behavioural marker system supported learning by depersonalising critique, legitimising peer feedback and enhancing trust through transparency. It also affirmed professional identity and fostered learner agency by making feedback specific and actionable. However, risks were identified when the tool was applied inconsistently, perceived as inauthentic or used in ways that emphasised negative descriptors.
conclusionsWithin simulation, behavioural marker systems are not sterile scaffolds but dynamic social instruments that shape the relational and emotional conditions of debriefing. When applied sensitively, they can depersonalise feedback and strengthen the educational alliance, supporting learners to take ownership of their development. Used rigidly or inconsistently, they risk damaging trust and fragile professional identities. Facilitators should introduce such tools as developmental guides, explicitly aligning them to professional practice and balancing structure with responsiveness to learners’ emotional and relational needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.