ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2026
Performance of a wearable movement tracking system in detecting hypomobility in acute ischemic cerebrovascular events.
Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetecting new or worsening hypomobility in acute ischemic cerebrovascular patients is challenging, especially when asleep or unattended. This study used a wearable movement acceleration monitoring system to identify changes in these patients, aiming to improve early detection.
methodsContinuous bilateral upper limb acceleration data, clinical characteristics, specific treatments, stroke etiology, and in-hospital outcomes were collected from patients. The primary outcome was newly emerging or worsening hypomobility during monitoring. An XGBoost model, trained with synthetic minority oversampling to address class imbalance and validated via 5-fold cross-validation, analyzed movement acceleration features to diagnose hypomobility timing. Model performance was evaluated through AUC and feature importance metrics.
resultsFrom April 2023 to February 2025, 85 patients with acute ischemic cerebrovascular events were enrolled; three were excluded due to data errors. A total of 82 patients were included in the analysis, comprising 76 (92.7%) with ischemic stroke and 6 (7.3%) with transient ischemic attack. Among them, 26 (31.7%) were women. The median monitoring duration was 26.9 hours (IQR: 24.6–46.5), with 15 patients (18.3%) developing hypomobility. The XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.965–0.985) and a mean AUC of 0.975 (SD 0.003) across folds. Optimized with a learning rate of 0.1, maximum depth of 6, and 200 boosting rounds, the model, at a cutoff of 0.587, recorded an average sensitivity of 0.969 and specificity of 0.900, accurately detecting 96.9% of the hypomobility cases. The overall metrics included a sensitivity of 0.966, specificity of 0.900, positive predictive value of 0.896, negative predictive value of 0.968, and F1-score of 0.930. The SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis revealed the significant contributions of the interaction terms (mean |SHAP| = 3.475) and slope features for movement changes (e.g., 1-min RSMA and LSMA slopes), while elevating the importance of the ‘Likely weak side’ predictor (mean |SHAP| = 2.053) in orienting asymmetry.
conclusionThis wearable movement acceleration monitoring system, by continuously tracking upper limb acceleration data, effectively detects the onset of hypomobility in acute ischemic cerebrovascular patients, highlighting its substantial potential for clinical application in enabling timely interventions and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.