ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Testing the usability of a voice control system for assistive robotic arms in people with neurological conditions.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Muscle Fiber-Based Soft Hand Exoskeleton Control Strategy for Fine Manipulation: A Preliminary Investigation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The acceptance and effective use of assistive robotic arms by people with neurological conditions strongly depend on the usability of the control interface. This study evaluated the usability of a voice control system for an assistive robotic arm in both healthy participants and individuals with neurological disorders, and compared its applicability and effectiveness with conventional joystick control. A voice control module based on automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech feedback was developed for a commercially available 6-degree-of-freedom assistive robotic arm. The system was implemented using the Robot Operating System (ROS) and an Italian speech-recognition knowledge base. Voice control was tested in 20 healthy subjects and 20 individuals with varying levels of upper-limb impairment due to neurological diseases. Participants performed representative activities of daily living, including (i) pressing an elevator button, (ii) picking up a TV remote control, and (iii) pouring water into a glass. Task completion time, usability, and speech recognition accuracy were assessed and compared between voice and joystick control. All participants except one with neurological impairment were able to successfully use the voice interface, whereas only 11 could operate the joystick. Voice control achieved a recognition accuracy of 87% and a System Usability Scale (SUS) score corresponding to a “Good” adjective rating. Overall, these results indicate that voice control represents a promising and inclusive access modality, with the potential to improve the usability of assistive robotic arms, particularly for individuals with severe motor impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.