ArticleJournal of biological engineering2026
Rotating algal biofilm reactors retain core microbial communities during scale-up.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroalgae-bacteria biofilm reactors are a promising alternative to conventional wastewater treatment because they can simultaneously remove nitrogen and phosphorus while producing harvestable biomass. Rotating algal biofilm reactors (RABRs) implement this concept by growing attached microalgae–bacteria biofilms on rotating surfaces that alternately contact wastewater and air, which can enhance nutrient uptake and simplify harvesting. However, successful field implementation requires that biological performance observed at lab scale translate to larger systems. Few studies have examined whether microbial community structure is conserved during scale-up. Here, using RABRs as a case study, we tested whether biofilm community composition is preserved during scale-up when all systems are seeded from a common trickling-filter biofilm inoculum.
resultsAcross scales, 16S profiles consistently showed dominance by Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes, supporting preservation of a core bacterial community. Phototrophic communities (23S) were similarly conserved, with Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria co-dominant across systems. In contrast, the 18S profiles showed greater variability, with the trickling filter strongly dominated by Opisthokonta, while the pilot-scale system exhibited substantial enrichment of Alveolata. Alpha-diversity patterns indicated that lab-scale reactors supported simpler communities than the trickling filter and pilot system.
conclusionRABR scale-up preserved dominant bacterial and phototrophic taxa when reactors were seeded from a common stable-composition trickling-filter inoculum, while eukaryotic communities showed greater sensitivity to operating context and outdoor exposure. These findings support inoculum sourcing and microbial community profiling as practical tools for scalable RABR design and process evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.