Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652492›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2026

Can phage-antibiotic combinations overcome uropathogenic Escherichia coli regrowth? evidence from in vitro and in vivo models.

Salsabil Makky, Assmaa H Hussein, Amira A Mohamed, Kareem Essam, Mona M Agwa, Marwa M Abd ElAziz, Ayman El-Shibiny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salsabil MakkyCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Assmaa H HusseinCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Amira A MohamedCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Kareem EssamCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Mona M AgwaDepartment of Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki, 12622, Giza, Egypt.
Marwa M Abd ElAzizDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21131, Egypt.
Ayman El-ShibinyCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza, 12578, Egypt. aelshibiny@zewailcity.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage therapy is currently gaining attention as a promising alternative for treating multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, including urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, most studies have reported bacterial regrowth in vitro after hours of co-incubation with phage-host bacteria. In this study, we evaluated whether using a phage alone or combined with gentamicin could delay or prevent bacterial regrowth in vitro, in human urine, and in a rat model. The previously characterized lytic phage vB_Eco_ZCEC08 was combined with gentamicin to target clinical Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) infection. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of gentamicin against the resistant EC08 clinical isolate were determined, revealing high gentamicin resistance (MIC = MBC, 500 µg/mL). Time-killing assays demonstrated that combining ½ MIC gentamicin (250 µg/mL) with the phage at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs) effectively controlled bacterial growth and prevented regrowth, even after 72 h, in both in vitro culture media and urine. Notably, the phage's growth exhibited distinct dynamics when used alone versus in combination with gentamicin in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. The combination showed higher replication rates in both urine and the rate model. For the in vivo experiments, bacterial counts showed significant reductions with both phage therapy and combination therapy compared to gentamicin monotherapy. Histopathological analysis of the tissues treated with the combination presented better tissue integrity than either monotherapy. These findings support the potential of phage-antibiotic combinations as an effective strategy against MDR-UPEC infections, highlighting the need for further studies to optimize treatment regimens for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriophagesEscherichia coli InfectionsGentamicinsPhage TherapyUrinary Tract InfectionsUropathogenic Escherichia coliAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRatsUrineAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicinsAntibiotic resistanceESKAPEEMultidrug-resistant bacteriaPhage therapyUropathogenic Escherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID41652492
PMCPMC12930829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.