ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Removal of syndesmotic screws - is sonography a precise and efficient method of guidance?
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSyndesmotic injuries can lead to ankle instability. They are treated with syndesmotic screws or suture device. The necessity for screw removal remains a topic of debate. When removal is performed, it usually occurs 2 to 3 months post-operation. In such cases, the screw is typically visualized flouroscopically before removal. We describe an ultrasound-guided procedure for screw removal that avoids radiation exposure and has minimal infrastructural requirements.
methodIn this prospective cohort study, Cohort 1 included 26 screws (18 patients) that were removed under both fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance. This allowed for the assessment of the accuracy of ultrasound compared to fluoroscopic visualization. In Cohort 2, 22 screws (17 patients) were removed solely under ultrasound guidance to evaluate the practical applicability of the method.
resultsA total of 35 patients were included into our study, eighteen in the first and seventeen in the second cohort respectively. In Cohort 1, the mean distance between the fluoroscopic and ultrasound measurement points of the screw heads was 2.9 mm. The mean radiation dose was 1.4 cGy/cm², and the mean operation duration was 15.2 min. Cohort 2 had a mean operative duration of 10.3 min. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Radiation exposure was not present in Cohort 2. In Cohort 1, the ultrasound-guided screw localization revealed high accuracy, with the threshold < 5 mm (p = 0.040). We did not identify any significant predictors for the screw localization accuracy. The duration of the surgical procedure was similar in both groups. In the entire pooled cohort, a longer distance from skin to screw was associated with a longer surgery duration (ρ = 0.419, p = 0.012). Skin-to-screw distance was found to be the only independent predictor of surgery duration (p = 0.009).
conclusionUltrasound-guided localisation and removal of syndesmotic screws demonstrate comparable accuracy compared to fluoroscopy, with the additional benefits of lower infrastructural requirements and associated costs. Furthermore, this method has a similar operative time to fluoroscopy and eliminates radiation exposure, supporting its feasibility as an efficient and safe alternative for syndesmotic screw removal.
trial registrationIn accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the University of Regensburg, Protocol number 21-2204-101.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.