Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41652447›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2026

Effects of a personalized exercise program on physical function in older patients with rheumatoid arthritis at high risk of sarcopenia: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Mie Torii, Akira Onishi, Ryuji Uozumi, Yu Hidaka, Hideo Onizawa, Takayuki Fujii, Koichi Murata, Kosaku Murakami, Masao Tanaka, Yohei Oshima and 14 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Mie ToriiHuman Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Akira OnishiDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryuji UozumiDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Economics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu HidakaDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hideo OnizawaDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takayuki FujiiDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Koichi MurataDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kosaku MurakamiDivision of Clinical Immunology and Cancer Immunotherapy, Center for Cancer Immunotherapy and Immunobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masao TanakaDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yohei OshimaRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroki TanakaRehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki UraiHuman Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyosuke TanigawaHuman Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroyuki YoshitomiDepartment of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hideaki TsujiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Mirei ShirakashiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryosuke HiwaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ran NakashimaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuko NinHuman Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ayae KinoshitaHuman Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Shuichi MatsudaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Akio MorinobuDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidenori AraiNational Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan.
Motomu HashimotoDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan. motomuhashimoto@gmail.com.

Funding

Research Funding for Longevity Sciences from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan 21-19the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) JP 20ek0410069h0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at a higher risk for sarcopenia than the general population. Exercise therapy can improve muscle strength in older adults; however, its efficacy in older patients with RA has not been fully established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a personalized exercise program on physical function in older patients with RA at high risk for sarcopenia.

methodsA single-centre, parallel-group, two-arm, superiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with RA aged 60-85 years who were at risk of sarcopenia. The intervention group (n = 69) underwent a 16-week personalized exercise program in addition to nutritional guidance and standard care, whereas the control group (n = 65) received only nutritional guidance and standard care. The primary outcome was the change in the total Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores from baseline to week 16.

resultsA total of 140 patients were randomized. Of these, 134 initiated the assigned intervention. There was a 0.2-point difference in SPPB total score from baseline to week 16 between the intervention group (+ 0.4 points) and the control group (+ 0.2 points); 95% confidence interval: -0.1 to 0.5; p = 0.206. Regarding the secondary outcomes at week 16, there was a tendency for improvement in the chair-stand test, grip strength, and the mental component score.

conclusionThe 16-week personalized exercise therapy did not improve the total SPPB scores. However, the intervention may improve standing ability, grip strength, and mental health-related quality of life in older patients with RA at high risk of sarcopenia.

trial registrationThis study was registered with UMINCTR (trial number: UMIN000044930).

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidExercise TherapySarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthPhysical Functional PerformanceTreatment OutcomeExercise therapyRandomized controlled trialRheumatoid arthritisSarcopeniaShort form-12 health surveyShort physical performance battery

Identifiers

PMID41652447
PMCPMC12977742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.