Trial reportBiomedical engineering online2026
Walking rehabilitation in incomplete spinal cord injury: evaluating the impact of robotic exoskeleton-assisted training.
Trial report in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative gait training using the Hybrid Assistive Limb for pediatric spinal intramedullary cavernous malformation: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation and Spinal Neuromodulation After Spinal Cord Injury: From Mechanisms to Trial-Informed Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of lower limb exoskeletons in clinical rehabilitation has expanded in recent years, offering potential benefits for walking recovery. However, current clinical evidence on their effectiveness remains inconclusive. Additionally, the way individuals adapt to these robotic devices and how this adaptation contributes to functional improvements is not yet fully understood. This study was intended to (1) investigate the safety and feasibility of the Fourier X2 exoskeleton for walking rehabilitation and (2) examine its effect on walking function following a rehabilitation program.
methodsA randomized controlled trial was undertaken with 46 individuals who had suffered a spinal cord injury (SCI) within the last year. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: an intervention group (IG), which received gait training using the Fourier X2 exoskeleton, and a control group (CG), which underwent conventional gait training. Each participant completed 20 gait training sessions lasting one hour. The neurological impairment ranged from C2 to L4, with participants classified under the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) C or D. The treatment program involved 20 gait training sessions, each lasting one hour, utilizing the Fourier X2 exoskeleton. Safety was assessed by tracking adverse events, while pain and fatigue levels were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Functional outcomes were evaluated through the Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II), Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III), and various walking assessments, including the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Timed Up and Go (TUG).
resultsNo major complications were observed during the study. Participants in the intervention group (IG) reported experiencing mild pain (1.7 cm, SD 1.1) and moderate fatigue (3.3 cm, SD 1.6) as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10 cm range). Statistical analysis of WISCI-II scores showed notable progress in both the "group" effect (F = 17.82, p < 0.001) and the "group-time" interaction (F = 7.27, p = 0.03). Further post-hoc evaluations revealed that the IG achieved a significant improvement of 3.20 points (SD 2.16, p < 0.0001), whereas the control group (CG) demonstrated a minor, non-significant increase of 0.5 points (SD 1.31, p = 0.32). No other variables showed significant differences between the two groups.
conclusionsThe Fourier X2 exoskeleton is both safe and well-tolerated in clinical environments. Participants who received training with the device exhibited enhanced walking independence, as reflected in their WISCI-II scores.
trial registrationThe Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR) includes this study under registration number ChiCTR2000041186, dated December 21, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.