ArticleBMC public health2026
Translation and validation of the Hebrew HITS screening tool for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV).
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a critical public health and human rights issue that remains underreported and often undetected, particularly in cultural contexts where stigma or taboo hinder disclosure. The Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream (HITS) screening tool is a brief, validated measure widely used in clinical and community settings for IPV detection (Sherin et al., Fam Med 30:508–12, 1998). However, a Hebrew-language version of the HITS tool has not previously existed.
methodsWe translated and validated the HITS tool into Hebrew using a multi-step process: forward translation, expert panel review, back-translation, and cognitive appraisal with 18 diverse participants. This was followed by field testing with 219 Hebrew-speaking students and recent graduates of Social Work in Israel, of whom 144 were women (M = 27) and 75 were men (M = 31). The study obtained prior approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Jerusalem Multidisciplinary College (no. 2023 − 382).
resultsThe Hebrew HITS scale demonstrated acceptable to strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.75; McDonald’s ω = 0.864) and good structural validity. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable model fit across multiple indices. Gender differences emerged, with men reporting significantly higher IPV scores than women, while no significant differences were found across levels of religiosity.
conclusionsThe Hebrew version of the HITS tool is a valid and reliable instrument for IPV screening in Hebrew-speaking populations and holds promise for use in clinical, academic, and community settings in Israel. Further research is needed to assess its use in more diverse and high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.