ReviewWorld journal of surgical oncology2026
Circulating tumor DNA-guided early detection and minimal residual disease monitoring in pancreatic and biliary cancers: evidence, barriers, and opportunities.
Review in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Serial ctDNA dynamics predict clinical outcomes in metastatic and locally advanced PDAC: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of Droplet Digital PCR Assay for the Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal, Gastric, and Endometrial Cancers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are characterized by dismal prognoses, largely because effective strategies for early detection are lacking and post-surgical relapse is common. Liquid biopsy—particularly circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis—offers a minimally invasive and highly specific approach to reshape the clinical management of these malignancies. In this review, we synthesize recent advances in ctDNA applications across two ctDNA-guided scenarios: early diagnosis/screening and postoperative minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. We trace the evolution of ctDNA detection technologies from digital PCR (ddPCR) to next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic assays, and summarize key prospective and retrospective studies in pancreatobiliary tumors. A central feature of our article is the side-by-side comparison of PDAC and BTCs, highlighting shared technical barriers—low ctDNA yield, stromal desmoplasia, clonal hematopoiesis—and their distinct genomic landscapes (PDAC: KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4; BTCs: IDH1/IDH2 mutations, FGFR2 fusions, ERBB2 or BRAF alterations), which together influence assay design and clinical interpretability. Finally, we outline clinical opportunities, including serial ctDNA-based risk stratification, ctDNA-informed adjuvant escalation/de-escalation, and the integration of multi-omics data, standardized reporting, and artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted signal analysis to improve sensitivity in low-shedding tumors. This framework aligns ctDNA technology with real-world clinical decision points in pancreatic and biliary cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.