ArticleBMC medical education2026
Learning through difficult disclosures of cancer progression: experiences of physicians and nurses in training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBreaking the news of cancer progression is a complex task that requires a balance between clinical accuracy and relational sensitivity. Although research has examined the perspectives of experienced healthcare professionals, little is known about how trainees navigate these consultations. This study aims to explore the experiences of medical and nursing trainees in disclosing disease progression, focusing on communication strategies, emotional impacts, and professional development.
methodsEighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with trainees in Swiss hospitals (11 oncologists and 7 nurses). The data were analyzed via thematic analysis.
resultsTrainees described disclosure as a carefully prepared, emotionally demanding process requiring clarity, empathy, and teamwork. Five themes emerged, with particular emphasis on experiential learning and the emotional burden of disclosure. Formal training and protocols provided limited guidance, while experience, supervision, and peer support were crucial in developing communication skills. Variability in patient and family reactions influenced decision-making and underscored the need for flexible, relationally attuned communication.
conclusionDisclosing cancer progression is a demanding experience for trainees, who described the need to adapt their communication, manage emotional responses, and rely on interprofessional collaboration. Their accounts highlight the central role of experience, supervision, and supportive environments in shaping how they navigate these challenging consultations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.