ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
What is the optimal implant removal timing following hook plate fixation in distal clavicle fractures: a retrospective analysis from subacromial osteolysis cases.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClavicular hook plates are widely used for the fixation of distal clavicle fractures, yet prolonged retention of the hook plate is associated with subacromial osteolysis (SAO), a common complication that may lead to poor functional outcomes. The optimal timing for implant removal remains unclear. PURPOSE: This retrospective study aims to identify the predictive factors for SAO and determine the optimal timing for implant removal that balances the prevention of complications with sufficient fracture healing.
methodsThis retrospective review was conducted on 92 patients who underwent hook plate fixation for displaced distal clavicle fractures between 2018 and 2024. Radiographic and clinical data were analyzed to assess the association between SAO development and various factors, including fracture classification, plate positioning factors, and implant retention time. Logistic regression and ROC curve analyses were used to identify independent risk factors and determine the optimal timing for implant removal.
resultsSAO was observed in 65% of patients (n = 60) following hook plate fixation. Multivariate analysis revealed that Neer Type IIb (OR: 5.63, p = 0.040) and Type V fractures (OR: 16.23, p = 0.014) were significantly associated with increased SAO risk. Implant retention beyond 5.3 months markedly elevated the risk (OR: 19.75, p < 0.001). ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.832, indicating excellent predictive accuracy. Severity of SAO also correlated with fracture type, particularly with Type IIb and V patterns.
conclusionProlonged implant retention and higher-grade fracture types significantly increase the risk of SAO after hook plate fixation. To reduce SAO incidence and improve outcomes, we recommended removal of the hook plate within 5.3 months postoperatively after confirmation of radiographic and clinical union, particularly in patients with Neer Type IIb or V fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.