ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing colonoscopy in Gaza Strip hospitals: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColonoscopy is a key diagnostic and therapeutic tool for colorectal diseases, including cancer, polyps, and bleeding disorders. In low-resource settings such as the Gaza Strip, challenges in access to healthcare may influence patient characteristics, indications, and outcomes of colonoscopy. Understanding these patterns is critical to improving diagnostic services and patient care.
methodsThis retrospective analytical study was conducted at the endoscopy unit of Gaza Strip hospitals and included all patients who underwent colonoscopy between 2017 and 2022. A total of 983 patients were identified from hospital records. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, presenting complaints, colonoscopic findings, and physician recommendations were collected using a structured questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v23, with descriptive and inferential methods applied.
resultsAmong 983 patients undergoing colonoscopy (mean age 52 ± 16 years; 61.4% male), most procedures were outpatient (93.6%) and performed under general anesthesia (97.8%). The most common indications were bleeding (35.2%) and follow-up (15.9%). Colonoscopy reached the cecum in 46.7% of cases. Findings were normal in 35.4%, while masses (11.0%), polyps (10.2%), diverticulae (5.0%), and hemorrhoids (7.5%) were the most frequent abnormalities. Abnormal findings were significantly associated with older age, male sex, non-outpatient admission, and bleeding as indication (p < 0.01). Management reflected procedural outcomes: normal findings mainly required follow-up, whereas significant abnormalities were more often referred for medical or surgical intervention (p < 0.001).
conclusionThis study highlights that colonoscopy in Gaza Strip hospitals predominantly serves middle-aged male patients, with bleeding being the most common indication. While many patients had normal findings, a considerable proportion presented with polyps, masses, or other abnormalities requiring further management. These findings underscore the importance of colonoscopy as a diagnostic and preventive tool and emphasize the need to strengthen screening and early detection strategies in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.