ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in patients with lung cancer: challenges in the Omicron era.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the Omicron era, COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated over 90% effectiveness against severe disease in the general population. However, vaccine effectiveness (VE) in patients with lung cancer, who are at high risk for severe COVID-19, has not been well characterized.
methodsIn this population-based cohort, we employed a test-negative design using linked data from the Ontario Cancer Registry, health administrative databases, and the Ontario vaccination registry. We included all patients with active lung cancer or mesothelioma residing in Ontario, Canada, who were symptomatic and underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing from January 2, 2022, to June 30, 2025. The outcome of interest was a severe outcome, defined as hospitalization within 14 days or death within 30 days following SARS-CoV-2 test. We constructed an analytic cohort that included the earliest testing episode among test-positive and test-negative patients with severe outcomes. We also performed a sensitivity analysis comparing test-positive patients with severe outcomes to randomly selected testing episodes among test-negative patients.
resultsAmong 47,344 tested patients, 3,332 (7.0%) were SARS-CoV-2 test-positive, of whom 1,967 (59%) experienced severe outcomes; 16,257 test-negative patients also developed severe outcomes. Adjusted VE against severe COVID-19 was 52% (95% CI: 42%, 60%) within 7–179 days post-vaccination, declining to 16% (95%CI: 0%, 30%) thereafter. In sensitivity analyses comparing 1,967 test-positive patients with severe outcomes to 18,922 randomly selected test-negative patients, adjusted VE was 49% (95% CI: 39%, 58%), declining to 12% (95% CI: −4% 26%) thereafter.
conclusionsIn this large population-based study of patients with lung cancer and mesothelioma, COVID-19 vaccination was associated with moderate protection against severe outcomes, including hospitalization and death. These findings emphasize the importance of optimizing alternative preventive strategies, such as masking, social distancing, ensuring household and caregiver vaccinations, and improving post-infection management through early antiviral therapy and close monitoring for severe disease. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.