ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Medication Reconciliation in Outpatient Psychiatry: An Indicator of Communication With Primary Care? A Quantitative Descriptive Study.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medication Reconciliation in Outpatient Psychiatry: An Indicator of Communication With Primary Care? A Quantitative Descriptive Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo quantify medication discrepancies between an outpatient psychiatric service and general practitioners in northern France, and investigate general practitioner identification in psychiatric records.
designQuantitative, exploratory, retrospective, descriptive, monocentric study.
methodStudy conducted in 2022 on 112 patients, comparing medication lists between the medical and psychological center and general practitioners through medication reconciliation.
resultsAmong the 33 patients (29.5%) with complete data allowing medication reconciliation, 84.8% had at least one discrepancy between medication regimens known to the outpatient psychiatric service versus those known to general practitioners. Discrepancies affected both psychiatric (85.7%) and nonpsychiatric medications (78.6%). 18.8% of the 112 patients did not have an identified general practitioner in the outpatient psychiatric records.
conclusionMedication reconciliation in outpatient psychiatry can improve treatment safety and create an opportunity for communication between care providers. IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights opportunities for advanced practice nurses to improve medication safety and interprofessional communication in outpatient psychiatric care through medication reconciliation, which appears to be a reliable indicator for quantitatively assessing communication while actively creating opportunities for dialogue between outpatient psychiatric care facilities and primary care structures. The implementation of these practices could be supported by the advanced practice nurses recently introduced in France, by raising awareness among healthcare professionals, by contributing to the therapeutic education of patients and by supporting the use of digital health tools. REPORTING
methodCompliance with EQUATOR RECORDS guidelines, extended from STROBE statements. PATIENT OR PUBLIC INPUT: This study did not include patient or public participation in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.