ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Greedy regression-based cross-species gene expression modeling: a translational framework for forensic wound age estimation.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forensic wound age estimation faces a significant translational gap, as molecular findings from indispensable animal models are challenging to apply to human casework due to the lack of systematic cross-species frameworks. To bridge this gap, we developed a computational framework for cross-species gene expression prediction and injury time inference. Using skeletal muscle contusion models in rats and pigs as a proof-of-concept, we employed greedy regression on 6,327 orthologous genes to construct a total of 3,058 translation models, comprising 284 regression equations based on genes with parallel expression trends across species and 2,774 equations based on conserved expression ratios. The framework successfully predicted pig gene expression from rat data, and a refined set of 156 high-confidence predicted genes enabled an LDA classifier to achieve 93.3% accuracy in cross-validation and 81.1% accuracy on independent porcine samples for injury time classification. This study establishes a generalizable computational paradigm that, by demonstrating robust cross-species transferability in a rat-to-pig system with human-relevant orthologs, provides a methodological proof-of-concept for translating molecular timing information to human forensic casework when experimental data are constrained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41652227What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.